Ph3Job Overview /h3 pbPosition title: /b Senior Programme Officer, Evaluation Learning /p pbContract type / duration: /b Temporary - 5 years /p pbLocation: /b Geneva /p pbDepartment: /b Office of the Chief Operating Officer (OCOO) /p pbTeam: /b Measurement, Evaluation Learning (MEL) /p pbReports To: /b Head, Evaluation /p pbN° of positions supervised: /b 0 /p pbCareer Step: /b 4 /p h3About the Role /h3 pThis is a senior technical position within the Evaluation (EvU) sub‑team of the Measurement, Evaluation and Learning team. Evaluations delivered in this role will be strategic‑level evaluations focused on Gavi’s levers (e.g. strategies, policies, funding levers) and programmatic evaluations. The Senior Evaluation Officer works collaboratively with teams across Gavi, primarily the Office of the Chief Executive Officer (OCEO), Country Programmes and Delivery (CPD), Vaccine Programmes (VP), Health Systems Immunisation Strengthening (HSIS), Policy, Strategy, Market Shaping and engages closely with Alliance partners such as UNICEF, WHO, The Gates Foundation and World Bank to generate high‑quality evidence. The EvU also engages with Gavi’s Board and Committees, primarily the Evaluation Advisory Committee (EAC) and provides input to Programme and Policy Committee (PPC), Governance Committee and the Board on evaluation at Gavi. EvU also collaborates with the Global Fund Evaluation and Learning Office to share learning and exchange on good evaluation practice. /p h3Core Mission Expected Impact /h3 ul liGenerate high‑quality evidence to inform strategic decisions: design, manage, and deliver targeted independent evaluations that answer Gavi’s priority questions, ensuring rigorous methods, strong stakeholder consultation, and high‑quality outputs that guide operational and strategic choices. /li liStrengthen evaluation across Gavi: improve policies, tools, guidance, and processes to enhance consistency, quality, and usefulness of evaluation and learning activities, while providing guidance and technical expertise and supporting cross‑team initiatives. /li liTranslate evidence into action for organisational impact: synthesize insights across studies, produce accessible learning products, support governance bodies, and drive the uptake of recommendations to improve programme performance, strengthen strategic planning and enhance accountability to stakeholders. /li /ul h3Key Responsibilities /h3 ul liDeliver high‑quality, timely evidence to answer Gavi’s priority evaluation questions and enable use of evidence, using fit‑for‑purpose study designs and clear communication of insights to inform strategic and operational decisions. /li liLead the commissioning and oversight of independent evaluations, ensuring transparent procurement, strong stakeholder engagement, and credible findings delivered on time and within budget. /li liDesign and deliver evaluation processes in‑house including evaluability assessments and rapid/discrete evaluative activities. /li liStrengthen Gavi’s evaluation and learning systems by developing improved guidance, tools, templates, and policies that enhance the quality, consistency, and usability of evidence across the organisation. /li liSynthesize and translate evidence into actionable insights, delivering accessible learning products and ensuring results to inform key Gavi processes, strategy, policies and operations. /li liDrive organisation‑wide engagement with evidence, coordinating cross‑team consultations, supporting Alliance responses to evaluation findings, and promoting clear, transparent communication to improve Gavi performance. /li liSupport effective governance and strategic decision making by producing high‑quality papers, presentations, and implementing follow‑up actions for the Evaluation Advisory Committee and senior leadership. /li /ul h3Experience Skills /h3 pbTypically 8+ years of progressively responsible experience in evaluation, research, learning, and evidence‑informed decision‑making. /b /p pbExperience of commissioning (i.e. as a commissioner – typically 2 years’+ experience of commissioning multiple evaluations) and leading the implementation of evaluations (i.e. as an evaluator – typically 6‑8 years’+ experience) from end‑to‑end is required. /b /p pbTypically 3 years’ experience of direct engagement with C‑suite/Senior leadership. /b /p h3Sector and Thematic Experience /h3 ul liExperience in public health, global health, development, or social sector programmes, with high relevance to health systems, immunisation, or large‑scale service delivery programmes. /li liExposure to multilateral organisations, foundations, donors, or public‑private partnerships is highly beneficial. /li /ul h3Project and Programme Experience /h3 ul liHands‑on experience designing, managing, and/or commissioning evaluations delivered by external consultants or research institutions. /li liExperience overseeing multiple concurrent studies, managing budgets, timelines, procurement and deliverable review processes, and quality assurance. /li liExposure to complex, organisation‑wide or cross‑programme initiatives, where evidence is used to inform strategy, policy, governance, or investment decisions. /li /ul h3Essential Education and Qualifications /h3 ul liAdvanced university degree (e.g., Master’s level) in a relevant field such as public health, social sciences, development studies, public policy, economics, evaluation, or a related discipline. /li liTraining or substantial applied experience in evaluation, research, and evidence‑generation methods. /li /ul h3Good to Have /h3 ul liA doctorate (PhD) or equivalent advanced research qualification. /li liFormal training or certification in evaluation/research methods (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods). /li /ul h3Technical and Functional Skills /h3 ul liEvaluation and evidence‑generation expertise: design, manage, and oversee evaluations using appropriate qualitative, quantitative, or mixed‑method approaches, with strong focus on quality and credibility. /li liAbility to identify more agile and timely methods with experience of innovative or emerging evaluation approaches (e.g. rapid evidence approaches, utilisation‑focused evaluation, theory‑based evaluation, systems or complexity aware methods) and experience building AI into evaluation processes. /li liAnalytical and synthesis skills: strong capability to understand governance bodies, senior leaders and business owners needs and to interpret complex findings, synthesise evidence across multiple sources, and draw implications for strategy, policy, and programme delivery. /li liManagement of external partners and consultants: manage independent evaluators, research suppliers, or consultants, including procurement processes, scopes of work, budgets, deliverables, and risk management. /li liEvidence‑to‑decision translation: demonstrated skill in transforming technical findings into clear, actionable insights, ensuring evidence is relevant and can be communicated effectively for a range of stakeholders for decision‑making processes. /li /ul h3Languages /h3 ul liFluency in English (written and spoken), with the ability to draft high‑quality technical and strategic documents tailored to key audiences. /li liWorking knowledge of French is a strong asset. /li /ul h3Behaviour and Mindsets /h3 ul liCollaborates effectively across the Alliance and with key stakeholders. /li liBuilds and sustains strong, trust‑based relationships across teams, departments, and Alliance partners at all levels. /li liEngages stakeholders (including C‑suite executives) early, values diverse perspectives, and works constructively across cultures and disciplines to achieve shared objectives. /li liFacilitates consultation, manages competing perspectives, and builds trust around evidence and learning. /li liCommunicates complex and technical information concisely, clearly, accurately, and transparently to diverse audiences, including senior leadership, governance bodies, technical experts, and non‑specialists. /li liAdapts style, language, and formats to support understanding, dialogue, and evidence‑informed decision making. /li liOperates effectively in dynamic, evolving environments, applying sound judgement and adjusting approaches as priorities, evidence needs, or organisational context change. /li liBalances methodological rigour with pragmatism to deliver timely, fit‑for‑purpose outputs. /li liWorks with a high degree of independence, taking responsibility for planning, decision making, and delivery of work. /li liManages multiple priorities effectively, follows through on commitments, and holds self and others accountable for quality, timeliness, and impact. /li liDemonstrates curiosity and openness to reflection, using evidence and feedback to improve ways of working. /li /ul /p #J-18808-Ljbffr